… a Brooklyn federal judge yesterday found that under the Bush administrations, FDA restriction on the morning-after pill had been influenced by conservative ideology and involved “political considerations, delays and implausible justifications,” rather than being grounded in science and “reasoned decisionmaking.”
Source: Dosomething.org
In his 52-page decision, Korman repeatedly criticized the FDA’s handling of the issue, agreeing with allegations in a lawsuit that the decision was “arbitrary and capricious” and influenced by “political and ideological” considerations imposed by the Bush administration.
“These political considerations, delays and implausible justifications for decision-making are not the only evidence of a lack of good faith and reasoned agency decision-making,” he wrote. “Indeed, the record is clear that the FDA’s course of conduct regarding Plan B departed in significant ways from the agency’s normal procedures regarding similar applications to switch a drug from prescription to non-prescription use.”
Source: WashPo
Another liberal baby-killing, far-left capitalism destroying, Ché hailing communist win and another conservative principle down for the count.
Strange how this is how it will played off throughout the country. Whenever the beliefs (in general) of the Democratic party are upheld, or in this case Roe v. Wade, it is simple dismissed as LLLIIBBeral (focus on enunciating the LIB part of the word and quickly finish the rest), Unamerican and by the way did you know in one of President Obama’s HQ’s during campaign season there was a massive Ché Guevara flag, which means your a pinko-commie.
The fun thing is, this is real, and it happened throughout the campaign, and has really has continued. It seems at least to me, some network pundits”tend” to report the facts but then using some rather sneaky psychology tricks, tend to opine their beliefs and force them upon you. While I have no problem with ones personal opinion, I despise these little games. Story A is reported, times are changing is the summary by the pundit, and with a witty, sardonic comment at the end the pundit reminds his audience of how things were better then traditional beliefs were upheld.
Oh how it irks thee! I feel as if a burning orange poker is being stuck into my side. Tradition! How wonderful a thing tradition is to this country! Slavery, sexism, racism, population transfers! No need to get into specifics for each of these, as I pray one knows a bit of history. It seems to me that “tradition” is always relative to the generation and and especially for my generation; technology and science.
My Grandfather’s generation had the invention of the mass-produced latex condom. (Made from rubber by Goodyear company beforehand)
![]()
Followed by my Mom and Dad’s being introduced to the pill which would allow Reagan to describe “the mess” at UNC Berkley.
“advocates of sexual orgies, drug usage, and filthy speech,” who wanted only to “disrupt the academic community” and who therefore must be brought under control immediately.

And now for my generation. We still have the condom, only quite a few more designs and accessories and the pill will always be around and we’ve made a few more; like Plan B.

My whole point of this entry was not to demonize tradition or conservatives more directly. But to applaud progression AND tradition. I stated sarcastically the great things tradition has brought us and by no means believe that is all it has done. The belief of liberty and freedom are things that will always be conserved in this country and they will always guide progression as well.
The questions I have are how much tradition do we save? How far forward do we go? I don’t mean these rhetorically and I’m not implying if we take one step forward we’re going to sprint the rest of the way and break apart all that we have saved.
I don’t know where else to go with this, I’ll finish this up later.. –>Publish