Tailgate: Obama, Sarkozy and the lolita?

The red-blooded presidents of the US and France study a matter of international interest yesterday — a 17-year-old junior delegate at the G-8 in Italy.
-NYPost

“Obama sure seems to have his eyes aimed at the wrong rump. Our own President, eyeballing a brazillian lolita, AT THE G8 SUMMIT. Our country is in its worst economic state since the depression from liberal statist/marxist spending, our marches against the statist/marxist commie liberals will be heard! The revolution has begun! Meanwhile, the liberal media is slandering our traditional values and lifestyles and not even covering the President committing Jackson-esque pedophilia!”
-Freerepublic.com (kidding, but partisan attacks hurt!)

Wait.  No.  Please, stop.  You’re stupid, stop typing. 

This is the gist of what is spread all throughout the blogosphere.  It’s an utter disgrace that this actually made “news” and is being discussed whatsoever.

The above pic was first splashed across the frontpage of drudge a day or so ago, and still currently is.  I felt no need to check the video from which the picture was taken because I already knew it some just another candid snapshot being using as another sneaky, implicit, right-wing smear.  But Oh lordy!  This crap is still being talked about.  Whether is FOX and Friends with their usual upbeat, happy go-lucky attitude and snide comments towards anything left of the far right or MSNBC and media matters debating Sarkozy’s intentions through the waay too happy smirk and chuckle.

This is the point we’ve reached.  No sources are checked, no context is given and there is no low the people who report this mess
will
not
go

/sigh

Anyways, here’s the video, tell me if I’m wrong.  Mute the sound unless you really want annoying morning show hosts narrating for you.

 

I’m at my grandparent’s home at the moment, I’ll reconvene on this topic when I’m back home.  I just need to stop writing about this, just talking about this has the chance to spread the cancer further.

EDIT:  I’ll admit I wrote the first few sentences in a matter of seconds trying to imitate the most ignorant right-winger possible, if that offends you, then it offends you.

Rambification of America: Fuck Krugman, he’s right, but I have hope.

A few beers, the final remnants of a bottle of ice wine and a few shots of Smirnoff really get the brain kicking.  I’m sitting here watching the latest and greatest of this generations ass-kicking, head-shot taking, hack and slash, kill until the motherfucker is making blood gushing noises those not seen since the Resident Evil series (the game) when zombies are devouring future human corpses.  Not to mention shooting people in the face with shotguns leaving nothing but a lower mandible and C3-7 left entact.

The ultimate revenge.  Your family is murderered by the mob and you seek vengence.  Taking family [mob] after family out until your blood thirst is quelled.  In the process you kill an undercover FBI agent and seek penance through assisting the family’s financial means and being rejected.  After discovering that the sick SOB whom the murdered agent you killed was monitoring decide to go out for blood and in the mean time, protect the slain servants family.

Everything plays out to where the crook is caught and let go through a corrupt judicial system.  Anticipating these flaws you rescue the agents family from murder, make a slip in whom you entrust to guard them and go on the flawless rampage of defeating some gang-banging lower than lowest of the socio-economic scale to once against prove your message.  Punish the evil do’ers through revenge.  The urban-gang-raise army is slaughtered through battlefield intelligence, the evil geniuses brother is shot in the third eye via high-calibur six shooter and the genius himself is stabbed kidney to kidney with an iron poker and laid on a seemingly gas lit fireplace to rest.

Strangely, but as I should have suspected, and as I had hoped for.  This movie was the near same as the Rambo flix of the past.  The warrior came back to win the war, but learned his lesson at the end.  It still idealizes the strict revenge mindset but there’s no controversial line of “Do we get to win this time?” or much spoken to prove the conclusion whatsoever.  But, audiences will recognize what I’m talking about;  Frank Castle (The Punisher) protects the family of the agent he’s accidently killed by doing what anyone with his nickname does; Punish.

The endless revenge plots will never end, but at least their message’s have changed.  We don’t just have some elite veteran coming back against the public tide, instead we see a man whom’s family has been murdered and will stop at nothing to defend anothers existential future.  Conversely, it seems audiences will always seek the justice they feel is deserved.

The psychology seen here is a mix of what we’ve seen, with what people re-produce over and over, plus more hardcore slaughtering and a different signal at the end.  The hero seemingly retires but leaves the conclusion open to all like how are political appointee’s answer any serious question.  There maybe a followup movie (sequel) but we’ll never known, or in this analogies sequence, we have no fucking idea what this public servant just said; they’re open to the question but will admit nothing.

As I stated, I’m quite “un-sober” as I love the phrase, and am as I am usually, rambling on about some offset topic on a seemingly unresponsive blog trying to vent my thoughts.  What this post entails to do is go against the tide of movies we’ve all seen.  There’s always those diehard [PUN!] action movies that we’ve all seen with the same message, but in this case, In was somewhat surprised; which doesn’t happen often.

Until next time folks?

Seemingly general philosophy of tradition and progression: Plan B > Conservatives

… a Brooklyn federal judge yesterday found that under the Bush administrations, FDA restriction on the morning-after pill had been influenced by conservative ideology and involved “political considerations, delays and implausible justifications,” rather than being grounded in science and “reasoned decisionmaking.”
Source:  Dosomething.org

In his 52-page decision, Korman repeatedly criticized the FDA’s handling of the issue, agreeing with allegations in a lawsuit that the decision was “arbitrary and capricious” and influenced by “political and ideological” considerations imposed by the Bush administration.

“These political considerations, delays and implausible justifications for decision-making are not the only evidence of a lack of good faith and reasoned agency decision-making,” he wrote. “Indeed, the record is clear that the FDA’s course of conduct regarding Plan B departed in significant ways from the agency’s normal procedures regarding similar applications to switch a drug from prescription to non-prescription use.”
Source:  WashPo

Another liberal baby-killing, far-left capitalism destroying, Ché hailing communist win and another conservative principle down for the count.

Strange how this is how it will played off throughout the country.  Whenever the beliefs (in general) of the Democratic party are upheld, or in this case Roe v. Wade, it is simple dismissed as LLLIIBBeral (focus on enunciating the LIB part of the word and quickly finish the rest), Unamerican and by the way did you know in one of President Obama’s HQ’s during campaign season there was a massive Ché Guevara flag, which means your a pinko-commie.

The fun thing is, this is real, and it happened throughout the campaign, and has really has continued.  It seems at least to me, some network pundits”tend” to report the facts but then using some rather sneaky psychology tricks, tend to opine their beliefs and force them upon you.  While I have no problem with ones personal opinion, I despise these little games.  Story A is reported, times are changing is the summary by the pundit, and with a witty, sardonic comment at the end the pundit reminds his audience of how things were better then traditional beliefs were upheld.

Oh how it irks thee!  I feel as if a burning orange poker is being stuck into my side.  Tradition!  How wonderful a thing tradition is to this country!  Slavery, sexism, racism, population transfers!  No need to get into specifics for each of these, as I pray one knows a bit of history.  It seems to me that “tradition” is always relative to the generation and and especially for my generation; technology and science.

My Grandfather’s generation had the invention of the mass-produced latex condom.  (Made from rubber by Goodyear company beforehand)

Followed by my Mom and Dad’s being introduced to the pill which would allow Reagan to describe “the mess” at UNC Berkley.

“advocates of sexual orgies, drug usage, and filthy speech,” who wanted only to “disrupt the academic community” and who therefore must be brought under control immediately.

And now for my generation.  We still have the condom, only quite a few more designs and accessories and the pill will always be around and we’ve made a few more; like Plan B.

My whole point of this entry was not to demonize tradition or conservatives more directly.  But to applaud progression AND tradition.  I stated sarcastically the great things tradition has brought us and by no means believe that is all it has done.  The belief of liberty and freedom are things that will always be conserved in this country and they will always guide progression as well.

The questions I have are how much tradition do we save?  How far forward do we go?  I don’t mean these rhetorically and I’m not implying if we take one step forward we’re going to sprint the rest of the way and break apart all that we have saved.

I don’t know where else to go with this, I’ll finish this up later..    –>Publish

Obama 2008

The post title declares my support.  That’s about all I have to say..

Kidding.

I constantly find myself reading new material, hearing new talking points and wondering if something is true or not.  I don’t know what to directly believe these days because there is just so much damn opinion and not enough fact.  I don’t wish to debate opinion/fact philosophy at the moment but can anyone else agree.

Throughout my time that I was giving a damn in highschool I learned alot of things.  The only thing I truly question is my history classes.  It seems taking my college courses vs. public education I was taught nothing besides the principle of the US.  We won WWII, Korea happened, we don’t talk about Vietnam and Reagan’s eloquent/ballsy articulation shut down the USSR and ended the cold war.
I mean this is a sarcastic serious point because these were the principles my generation is taught.  Is it because teaching these talking points is easier?  or maybe because students are forced to learn so much in a little amount of time.  I remember my HS US History class now, it was civil war antecedent until present times.  All we were tested on is talking points, and reflecting on this now it infuriates me.  Nothing against my teacher (he was the best out of the lot – I had 3 teachers I liked, that’s it, the rest just wanted to argue and put their status above myself and not debate – I’ve always been a little shithead in one way or another ), but seriously, I was only taught the “what” of history and not the “why” or “how”.  Anyways, I’m getting sidetracked to what I wanted to originally post on..  Which I will be finishing tomorrow along with adding a “I’ve heard to much of… and to little of…” post about the ’08 election.

Cali Rhine wine is delicous, if I could afford better wine I’d say so, but Franzi..  You are my friend..

fucking scribefire

I had this nice little random thought blog all nicely done and I clicked publish.
I didn’t.
I don’t feel like rewriting the entire thing so here’s the gist.

I read a lot of junk on politics, current events, political theory, history and philosophy. MY arguments and views on a lot of things have changed throughout this process. But now I am starting to come back to my original ways before I did any of this. Strange this is..

I’m going back to watching the Aqua Teen movie on CN, I’ll have some real blogs this weekend.

Independent thinking – Part 1 of ?

A brief history with the struggle I’ve had with myself.

When I first started getting into politics and current events around the world I found myself directed to the right wing with some liberal views. When the presidential campaign began, I found myself drawn towards Rudy and then eventually Ron Paul (my views had changed a bit you could say). While I then and now disagree with Rudy – not that it matters, I find myself agreeing with Dr. Paul and now still do if the world and people were perfect. If everything was good and just, people were not ignorant of others beliefs, if no one was race/sex/whatever-discrimination-word-you-want-to-use, Ron Paul would be my prime selection for President. But we don’t live in a perfect world. Companies take advantage of people. People kill people over the stupidest more redundant things and are intolerant of opposing views over their own moral high-ground opinion.

I learned a bit more in the last semester of college and found myself with the fundamental liberalism of Obama – views change once again? This political roller-coaster led me even further, while I still support Obama, and don’t think he’s perfect. I’d just like to state why I would like to declare myself an Independent. Moreso updating the Northmore Doctrine or just once again, explaining my current mode of thinking.

Healthcare: Is it something we are all entitled to? Yes, we should all have HealthCare (HC)to enable us to learn, work and live. This should be a fundamental right in our country, as it is in every industrial and information age nation. Now, should private enterprise or the government control it? Both, if that is possible. The VA hospitals stories broke a few years ago, of the abomination of care we were providing our returning vets (more on this later) makes me think the government could never run a system for all the people. But the way HC is operating now, people can lose their financial lives in attempting to pay for it. I have a friend whom at the young age of 21 is in thousands of dollars of debt for a weeks worth of hospital testing, in which they have failed to diagnose his problem, but prescribe and temporary fix. How is he supposed to pay this enormous amount of money, for so little help?
Now, if the government controlled this, he might be forced to see one doctor over his personal choice, he might not, who knows, but something should be done so the American dream can truly prosper, or at least give him the opportunity to do so, without worrying about which test or medication he can afford. I wish their was a middle of the road, but there isn’t at this time.

Current wars: Big topic, I’ll try to go as quickly as I can. The current Iraq/Afghan wars were started to get back at those who attacked us on 9/11 (which by the way was a massive intelligence failure – I don’t play into the conspiracy theories). Saddam had WMD’s, propaganda groups were started to lure us in and every liberal talking point can be inserted in here. So, do we roll with the McCain or Obama course? I don’t know. Even with every single problem we’ve had, every single thing you can bring up against the war – which is easily stated for some AFTER a vote to goto war or AFTER intelligence failures (I guess Saddam, really didn’t have WMD’s), the success of the surge, though not accomplishing its intended goals, is working. Why haven’t there been the number of reports on the war as seen before the first or even second Patreaus/Crocker report in congress? Because things are going well, or least to say, better than they were in 2007. The Sunni-Shia-US forces war is dissipating, Al-Queda is dying off and Iraq’s parliament recently asked for the US to start withdrawing because we have given them some of the required opportunity to govern and protect themselves and are now interfering with their national sovereignty (someone wants permanent bases). Our troops have performed amazingly, though their goals have changed and their strategies have adapted to the problems they face.
I bring you to my problem.
We invaded, destroyed their country, ousted a dictator, replaced him an initial relatively weak government, thousands are worse, some are better, but do we leave? Do we face an obligation to help these people for our actions?
Yes.
Can we sustain this war?
No.
Our falling dollar attributes to this. We’re borrowing money to sustain ourselves overseas (more on money later). Our dollar falls, oil/barrel skyrockets and all goods (transported by truckers) are rising and will go higher. What are we to do? We’ll hopefully get a true preview on January 20th, 2009.

(Not exactly finished with these topics, but I need sleep)

Tomorrow: Finish these up, the Economy & Veterans benefits.

Senator Kennedy

Senator Kennedy’s recent diagnosis of a cancerous tumor in the left parietal lobe has brought different emotions and responses from all.  Senator Byrd coming to tears while giving his best wishes and Arlen Specter giving his personal experience with chemo and betting he’d fine better himself in his battle.  Many other colleagues giving the same sentiment.

Then there is the bloggers..  Which I first noticed when Reagan passed and the left claiming it was “the end of a ruthless free-market oligarch” and “the final day of a despicable individual”.  Now it’s the right stating “liberal trash is about to croak”.

Sick and disgusting people, no matter what your political views are, at least have the decency to respect a life.

My best friend and grandfather died from brain cancer and I know the long struggle the Senator faces, and I wish him and his family the best.

Clinton’s genius, will Obama follow?

Airing tonight and tomorrow Senator Hillary Clinton will match up against FOX New Channel’s Bill O’Reilly at 8pm.  Trying to woo FNC’s republican viewers to her cause over McCain will be a challenge but this maybe a way to lure her own parties delegates, instead.

O’Reilly is one of the my favorites pundits, not many know or believe that he is a independent, we may support the Iraq war and come off a purely right-winger but he’s also pro-choice and for marijuana reform.  He’s known for unflinching questioning of his guests and his “The Spin Stops Here” phrase is deeply upheld, in my belief.  He may not always be “right” in his analysis but I have to give the man respect.

My question is, will Obama follow?  Refusing to go on FNC is a act of cowardness, your going to be president and can’t stand some political/ideological/personal flack (not that he needs anymore), maybe this would get McCain on Olbermann…

hahaha

LOOK ANOTHER LIBERAL ON A MAC – HOW FUCKING IRONIC!

Seriously, WTF is wrong with America..

I sit here clicking links off drudge and yahoo news, looking for some sort of positive news to share with anyone whom reads this, just to vent, or just for some reason I feel the need to give a opinion on something with my limited knowledge.

What I find is more bad news, more terrible things, more people using the same old euphemistic bullshit. More excuses, no real answers, no real news, just the same old opinionated analysis that I am sick of reading.

Bush today was quoted in saying he has no doubts about launching the unpopular war in Iraq despite the “high cost in lives and treasure,” arguing that retreat now would embolden Iran and provide al-Qaida with money for weapons of mass destruction to attack the United States.

Well Mr. Bush, another great piece of insight from your usual rhetoric battle chest. We’re in Iraq until we win. How do we win? A question I asked in my first post on this blog and despite no one really addressing the question, this will war will not end until until you have achieved 2 things. One, in which we have already succeeded in, our world reputation being completely shot and two either until we officially cannot send any more money over or until you leave office.

Actually, either way, we’re not leaving. Democrats have changed their position from the “Enders of the War” to the “People who will end the war kinda soon, as long as few things are achieved and we don’t look bad”. Well neither can be met.

Listening to Jay Diamond host the Alan Colmes show on FOX News talk he brought up a point I never thought of. He stated that the next president should dig up all the secrets this administration has concealed, reveal them to the world and apologize for the war mongering imperialism we have continued to act on since entering this godforsaken place. Before we came to Iraq, IED’s, Car bombings and suicide bombers did attack the people, but not at this rate. Every-fucking-day, all I see is “Great security gains, but no Political reconciliation”, 9 more Iraqi’s die from a mentally handicapped person in a wheelchair used as a explosive device. What else are we going to put up with? I believe it was the Associated Press (AP) whom reported that 54% of the US people agree we are doing good in Iraq. I do not think this is a accurate representation of the mindset of the people of this great country. We know we are just saving face in Iraq. This war is impossible to “win”. There will always be danger in the middle east, there has been since time and morium, yet Bush & Co. believe we can be the godsends to come in rid the area of violence.
As soon as Bush posted his “Mission accomplished” sign behind one of our great destroyers, the gods descended upon our grand leader with holy might, filling him with the power to fix all of the problems in the various cultures. They peoples all rejoiced in peace and held hands, all problems solved, no more religious vendetta’s and all terrorist groups disbanded and become altruists. We broke bread and shared a table with all who has been healed.

Except that didn’t happen. We got a mugshot of a criminal president wearing a fighter pilot uniform. Washington and Eisenhower refused to wear the military uniform based on common decency. When they became president, they were no longer soldiers of our great nation, but the political leader. They knew this, yet Bush didn’t. Maybe it’s because of his less then stellar grades at Yale. Who knows.

/sigh

Another rant written, more energy expunged on something that is useless to write except for my own personal self-edification or just to fucking rant. I, amongst millions are so sick of this damn war and we still haven’t been given a cogent premise that hasn’t been proven fallacious after being investigated.

Okay. Enough “America bashing”. Anymore and Sean Hannity will have to make another bumper sticker to ruin the country even further.

The Supreme Court is ruling properly in stating that Americans have the right to bear arms. We do, if you don’t believe so, too bad. Now, am I saying everyone including criminals, clinical psychopaths do? No. I believe that if you fit the standards to serve Jury Duty (sadly too many do though..) you can own a gun. If you are sane, not a mass murderer who suddenly was found insane and got off, and are at least somewhat competent you can protect yourself in your dwelling. Can you carry guns on you 24/7 while you fill your gas tank or grab a bite to eat? I personally don’t support this. I believe you have the right to defend yourself at home, but not in everyday public areas. If we had stiffer penalties for those “packing heat” in public, I believe it would lead to a safer societies. There should be no reason your carrying a beretta to get groceries. But what about those “drug gang-bangers” and hooligans who could kill me at any moment. Well, there’s two issues in it self. I’ll tackle the gun issue first. Those gang bangers and hooligans would HOPEFULLY decline if stiffer laws were imposed. You can have all your guns on your property and make a fortress inside if you deem it necessary. Conversely, doesn’t this seem better then having a entire populous packing a mack-10 of .50 caliber deagle? One thing leads to another and you have bar fights blasting away at each other and it turns into a Godfather like shootout because someone stepped on another persons kicks or spilled a drink on someone.
Second, those damn drug dealers. Menaces to society. They need to be destroyed… RAWR. Ok. Lets examine this a little more without the sarcasm. People get wasted off brew and whiskey yet it is deemed legally acceptable as long as they have a DD and don’t drive. Yet smoking marijuana isn’t? A analogy Dennis Leary made in Stuff magazine a few years ago I feel is the best way to describe my position.

Alcoholics get drunk, start fights, make us regret the previous night, and make us do things we would not do if we had been sober. I feel thats a nice way of putting drunken sex and pregnancy excuses.
People who smoke the herb aka stoners, sit in their basement, get high, listen to some Led Zeppelin and Kotten Mouth Kings, eat doritos and maybe even a pizza.

But what about Reefer Madness! If you smoke weed you go insane and going on shooting rampages. No thats people mentally unstable people snapping and the rampage is the end result. You smoke a joint and you mellow out and sometimes become strangely philosophic, at least that is my experience.

Another part to add to this little argument. People who sell pot sell a variety of other hard drugs. Coke, Heroin, Extasty, and PCP to name a few. Well if weed was legalized would we be socializing with these people in the first place? Even MEDICINAL marijuana is illegal in most places and strangely legal under the strangest circumstances in other situations – vending machines in Cali ring a bell? How fast were those things robbed/vandalized?

I should really rename this blog to “News story + random tangent”, because that is what I feel I am writing. Everytime something new or whatever happens, I state what an article says and go off on my own line. But do ya blame me? According to 60minutes I believe, or another one of the primetime news shows – not sure which exactly. My generation wants to feel important, feel involved, feel like we’re doing something. But its kinda hard with healthcare costs while in college, working for shit wages, paying for student loans into the time when we conceive children.

/sigh #2

Topic of my next rant – The Expulsion of the Conservative party when the baby boomer generation has died off.

Just because you think your views are the best and the most righteous, doesn’t mean they are, and SPECIFICALLY doesn’t mean someone can legislate those views for all. God – I mean Astral Non-secular omnipotent being, what the fuck were you people thinking.